[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 21/3/2008, "Andrew Haley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał/a: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> 21/3/2008, "Andrew Haley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał/a: >>> >>>> I don't know for sure about libgmp, but the others don't need execstack. >>> hmm, looks like PR libffi/28036. >> How would this affect libgmp? > > proviously listed libgmp is a copy-paste bug, > but i'm wondering why libffi wasn't fixed since 4.1 release?
Because no-one did it. It's simple enough to do and doesn't require approval from all the back-ed maintainers individually. In http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00949.html Andrew Pinski asked a question that was never answered. If doko would answer that question, the patch could be committed. Andrew.
