Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Another approach would be to only use the carets for parse errors, >which is where they are the most helpful.
And preprocessor if possible [also sometimes I would love to have an option in gcc to just display the preprocessed input when something bad happens inside a macro. I usually do that from hand using gcc -E, but it would be cool if the compiler could do it automatically, ideally with carets] > What do other compilers do? Reopening the file doesn't work for > standard input, which I admit is an unusual case. I think it would be reasonable to just not display the carets if the input is not seekable. Surely qemu doesn't need carets for once. -Andi