Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Why are constructors included twice in object code?
This is required by the C++ ABI.
It is, in my opinion, a real bug that gcc does not simply merge
identical constructors.
I agree.
Up until now, I think all of the patches have introduced additional
thunks of some kind. Actually giving both names to the same entry point
would avoid the ABI problems, and thus be non-controversial. (The ABI
explicitly endorses multiple entry points as a solution.)
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713
