On Feb 18, 2008 8:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:58:26AM +0100, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:44:18PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > > > Or we can just duplicate the 2 inline asms for __GNUC__ < 3 > > > or what is the oldest GCC that can handle the alternatives correctly. > > > The __cpuid asm is short and the other one, while long, doesn't need > > > changing too often. > > > > I'll try to fix it that way. > > BTW, I've just tested gcc 3.2.x and 2.96-RH (the oldest I could find around) > and both handle the alternatives in asm just fine. > From what I can see in SVN, ASSEMBLER_DIALECT is defined in config/i386.h > since the merge of the "new" i386 backend by rth in September 1999. > As 2.96-RH wasn't an official FSF release and nobody probably used it in > Intel mode anyway, I think __GNUC__ < 3 is the right test.
Yes, this is what my limited search found, too. Starting with GCC 3.0 we are handling intel asm syntax. Richard.
