2008/1/28, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/1/26, Jonathan Wakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 22/01/2008, Christian Joensson wrote: > > > 2008/1/21, Jonathan Wakely > > > > My first guess would be that you've somehow got the C++0x and TR1 > > > > versions of boost_sp_shared_count.h mixed up and you're including the > > > > wrong one. > > > > > > well, the testsuite results are posted at, e.g., > > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00956.html > > > > > > and the libstdc++.log file is attached, compressed using bzip2 -9 > > > > Thanks, Christian. > > > > I've CC'd the libstdc++ mailing list, I'll leave it to the next person > > who replies to decide whether to continue this thread on that list > > rather than gcc@ > > > > I only have to look as far as this to see a major problem: > > FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++200x/all.cc (test for excess errors) > > Excess errors: > > In file included from > > /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++200x/all.cc:111: > > /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/64/libstdc++-v3/include/memory:86:48: > > error: tr1_impl/boost_sp_counted_base.h: No such file or directory > > > > That should not happen on any platform! > > > > And later: > > FAIL: 17_intro/using_namespace_std_tr1_neg.cc (test for excess errors) > > Excess errors: > > In file included from > > /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/using_namespace_std_tr1_neg.cc:40: > > /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/64/libstdc++-v3/include/memory:86:48: > > error: tr1_impl/boost_sp_counted_base.h: No such file or directory > > > > Again, that should not happen on any platform. > > > > Thanks for the logs, I don't have any way to test on that platform > > unfortunately, but it seems that the symlinks for the new shared_ptr > > headers are missing. I think that would happen if you hadn't done a > > clean bootstrap, since the Makefiles generated by configure would not > > have been updated when I added the new headers. > > > > Do you reuse objdir, without removing it entirely? > > I have... I have also started e clean new build and check. >
there, the errors are indeed gone, test results posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00237.html -- Cheers, /ChJ
