On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:16:43PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > At the moment, I'm working on getting sh, h8300, and m32c in shape for > > 4.3 (or future). I can easily get the test results under 400k by > > removing some of the multilibs, but I don't think that's a good idea. > > My sh-elf test tests 38 multilibs, if I only test one that would be a > > 12k email, which would easily fit past the filters. Are we > > artificially penalizing targets with many multilibs? > > If results are being rejected without indicating the target is in terrible > shape, you could ask overseers to increase the size limit on > gcc-testresults.
Or the test script could be fixed to pre-scan the message instead of just piping it to a mailer. If its size exceeds some limit (say 300k), the mail could be replaced by a shortened form, giving only the total numbers of failures with a big message at the beginning indicating that the message was truncated because of the massive number of failures.
