Please stop spamming my gcc@gcc.gnu.org email box. All the messages that you sent are just off-topic for this mailing list. Please STOP sending emails.
Thank you, Sebastian Pop On Dec 12, 2007 4:42 PM, J.C. Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2007/12/12, Jonathan Wakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/12/2007, J.C. Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > * The googlish user says > > > "i'm using the massive googlecc compiler that uses a lot of tons > > > of libraries > > > distributed in all the world!" > > > > > > * google shutdown => googlecc compiler doesn't work, ended history, > > > byebye. > > > > Yet again you've jumped into a thread without understanding the > > subject and you've said something completely irrelevant. Bravo! > > > > I suggest you shut up and read the paper before you embarrass yourself > > further. > > > > This is only a suggestion, intended to be helpful. I respect your > > right to say anything you want and to make yourself look like a fool > > in public. I will not prevent you from doing that. > > > > Jon > > > > They are gaming or playing with the words of the language for Google. > > If the world is global then > ^^ what means "global optimizer" using the infraestructure for google? ^^. > > For google: > ----------- > * "whole program optimizer infrastructure for GCC" means > "a whole program (like DoD program?) to build an optimizer infrastructure > (physical, it that has Google but want to optimize still more it) for GCC"? > > * "flexible enough to accommodate" means "like it from google.com"? > > * "an efficient implementation" means > "an efficient construction of the infrastructure"? > > * "Whole-program analysis" means "to analyze the whole program"? > > * "massive memory consumption during compilation" means > "hey, more memory? => more machines like from google!"? > > * "whole-program optimization framework for GCC" doesn't mean > "program whole-optimization framework for GCC" but, > means it "a whole-program that optimizes the framework for GCC"? > > * "Call-graph partitioning to group closely related functions" means > "fragmenting the graph of remote calls to group closely related services"? > > * "Support incremental optimization" means > "we can support incrementaly our services of optimizing the infrastructure"? > > * "impossible (or undesirable) to fit all the function bodies in memory" > means "impossible in memory of machines but possible in disks of machines"? > > * "global call-graph" means "world's graph of remote calls"? > > * "global call-graph itself can always fit in memory" means > "ohh, the world's graph of remote calls always is in memory of machines"? > > * "1M nodes" means "one million of machines"? > > * "1M edges" means "one million of cables"? > > * "< 500 Mb of memory" means "< 500 megabits of memory for remote calls"? > * "WHOPR tries to maximize the amount of parallel and independent work to > take advantage of clustered and multiprocessor machines" means > "WHOPR tries to use ALL that Google has parallelly it taking its advantage > due to its machines that Google has"? > > * "local generation" means "it generated locally by each machine"? > > * "global call-graph is assembled" means > "world's graph of remote calls is assembled"? > > * "global analysis process makes transformation decisions" means > "the process that Google analyzes spying the world make decisions of how to > transformate the world"? > > * "partitioned to facilite optimization" means "fragmented to facilite the > reduced computation of Google"? Or > > * "global call-graph may be partitioned to facilitate optimization" means > "partitioned to metropolies, cities and towns the ADSL telephonic branches > needed by Google to facilitate its operation of this infrastructure"? > > * "local transformations" means "the local police will do its action > against e-criminals"? > > * "executable" means "it's from an execution to death of the e-prisoner"? > > * "Indirect call promotion" means "this promotion indirectly ehhhh?"? > > * "Dead variable elimination" means "elimination variable of R.I.P.s"? > > * etc. > > J.C.Pizarro i though that the Apocalypsis is near. >
