For the record: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/compilerstuff/gitgcc/gccrepo$ git --version git version 1.5.3.7
(I downloaded it yesterday when i started the import) On 12/5/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I tried a full history conversion using git-svn of the gcc > repository (IE every trunk revision from 1-HEAD as of yesterday) > The git-svn import was done using repacks every 1000 revisions. > After it finished, I used git-gc --aggressive --prune. Two hours > later, it finished. > The final size after this is 1.5 gig for all of the history of gcc for > just trunk. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/compilerstuff/gitgcc/gccrepo/.git/objects/pack$ ls -trl > total 1568899 > -r--r--r-- 1 dberlin dberlin 1585972834 2007-12-05 14:01 > pack-cd328fcf0bd673d8f2f72c42fbe67da64cbcd218.pack > -r--r--r-- 1 dberlin dberlin 19008488 2007-12-05 14:01 > pack-cd328fcf0bd673d8f2f72c42fbe67da64cbcd218.idx > > This is 3x bigger than hg *and* hg doesn't require me to waste my life > repacking every so often. > The hg operations run roughly as fast as the git ones > > I'm sure there are magic options, magic command lines, etc, i could > use to make it smaller. > > I'm sure if i spent the next few weeks fucking around with git, it may > even be usable! > > But given that git is harder to use, requires manual repacking to get > any kind of sane space usage, and is 3x bigger anyway, i don't see any > advantage to continuing to experiment with git and gcc. > > I already have two way sync with hg. > Maybe someday when git is more usable than hg to a normal developer, > or it at least is significantly smaller than hg, i'll look at it > again. > For now, it seems a net loss. > > --Dan > > > > git clone --depth 100 git://git.infradead.org/gcc.git > > > > should give around ~50mb repository with usable trunk. This is all thanks to > > Bernardo Innocenti for setting up an up-to-date gcc git repo. > > > > P.S:Please cut down on the usage of exclamation mark. > > > > Regards, > > ismail > > > > -- > > Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again. > > >
