On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>> Kaveh R GHAZI writes:
>
> Kaveh> I think the answer is "maybe". In the past we have counted
> compile-time
> Kaveh> savings as appropriate for stage3 regression fixes. However IMHO you
> Kaveh> would need to provide some measurement of the improvements (memory
> saved,
> Kaveh> speed timings) so the RM and perhaps middle-end maintainers can weigh
> the
> Kaveh> risk vs benefit and make an informed decision.
>
> Kaveh,
> The time savings fall out of the algorithm improvements.
> David
I believe you that there are improvements to be had, and I'd like to see
them in GCC. And I want to clearly state that I believe compile-time
fixes are appropriate for stage 3.
Perhaps the confusion was whether Steven was asking if he's facing a
priori rejection, or if he's asking for a priori approval. Those are two
entirely different requests.
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
