Jason Merrill wrote:
Andrew MacLeod wrote:
But yes, Id still be in favour of trying this or anything else which might help. Cut a release branch, and simply refuse to open stage 1 until we release.

I think I prefer Richard's suggestion of not branching until we're ready to make the .0 release. The effect should be the same except that people don't have to deal with checking patches in on the branch vs. the trunk until after 4.3.0 goes out.

Sure, I think it boils down to the same thing from a conceptual point of view, but perhaps the nitty gritty details are easier if you keep it as mainline so we dont have to check everything into 2 branches. Bottom line is you freeze development until its time to release.

Andrew

Reply via email to