Bart Van Assche writes: > On 10/27/07, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And this isn't really specific to threads.
> What I was trying to explain is that it is not necessary to declare > shared variables volatile, not for any C/C++ compiler that is > compliant with the language standard. Sadly, you didn't quote any language in the standard to justify such a statement. If you expect anyone to take you seriously you'll have to do that. For what it's worth, I don't believe that's what the ISO C standard says. In any case, this discussion is pointless: we are moving towards tracking the proposed memory model, which solves the problem. Andrew.
