"Diego Novillo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 9/29/07, Richard Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is this a known problem? (I tried to find it in bugzilla, but couldn't) > > I can reproduce it on x86_64 as well. The 1/0 statement should not be > considered replaceable by out-of-ssa. Could you file a bug for this?
Done as 33593. > This patch should fix it. Still being tested: Thanks for the quick fix! Richard
