On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:53:38PM +0200, Tomas Svensson wrote: > (define_expand "bleu" > [(use (match_operand 0 "" ""))] > "" > "expand_branch (LEU, operands[0]); DONE;") > > which is heavily inspired by the or32 port of version 3.4.4, as is > expand_branch().
> But this should not need a matching insn, since it ends in a DONE;, > right? Wrong. Everything emitted by an expander needs to be matched by an insn pattern. > Or am I missing something again? The construct (define_insn "name_not_beginning_with_asterix" ... probably should have been (define_expand_and_insn "name_not_beginning_with_asterix" ... for clarity. -- Rask Ingemann Lambertsen Danish law requires addresses in e-mail to be logged and stored for a year
