On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:33:24AM +1200, Ross Smith wrote: > > [...] If the request succeeds, the value returned shall be a nonnull > > pointer value (4.10) p0 different from any previously returned value > > p1, unless that value p1 was subsequently passed to an operator delete. > > That's not sufficient. First, merely requiring pointers to be different > isn't the same as requiring them not to alias, which requires the blocks > of memory they point to not to overlap.
That might be grounds for a defect report; clearly the blocks handed out must not overlap, or conforming programs will fail.
