On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Index: libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new
> ===================================================================
> --- libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new (revision 128207)
> +++ libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new (working copy)
> @@ -92,7 +92,8 @@
> * Placement new and delete signatures (take a memory address argument,
> * does nothing) may not be replaced by a user's program.
> */
> -void* operator new(std::size_t) throw (std::bad_alloc);
> +void* operator new(std::size_t) throw (std::bad_alloc)
> + __attribute__ ((malloc));
> void* operator new[](std::size_t) throw (std::bad_alloc);
> void operator delete(void*) throw();
> void operator delete[](void*) throw();
If this is accepted, IMHO you should use __attribute__((__malloc__)) not
__attribute__ ((malloc)).
Thanks,
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
