Re: Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?

[Rask Ingemann Lambertsen]

On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 10:09:25AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> >   Thanks for reminding me to ping that patch.
> 
> Could you try moving this case statement
> 
> +     case "$target" in
> +       i[[3456]]86-*-elf* | i[[3456]]86-*-coff*)
> +         libgloss_dir=i386
> +         ;;
> +       m68hc11-*-* | m6811-*-* | m68hc12-*-* | m6812-*-*)
> +         libgloss_dir=m68hc11
> +         ;;
> 
> above in another "case $target in" statement?

   I don't understand what you want it to look like. Your explanation sounds
to me like

        case "$target" in
          i[[3456]]86-*-elf* | i[[3456]]86-*-coff*)
            libgloss_dir=i386
            ;;
          m68hc11-*-* | m6811-*-* | m68hc12-*-* | m6812-*-*)
            libgloss_dir=m68hc11
            ;;
        esac

        case "$target" in
        ... rest of cases go here ...

          *)
            libgloss_dir=${cpu}
            ;;
        esac

but then the default of the second case construct will override libgloss_dir
from the first one, if I'm not missing something here.

-- 
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen