On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 09:58 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > If you want to release gcc 4.2.2, and then release gcc 4.3.0 from the > gcc 4.2 branch, and make mainline gcc the eventual gcc 4.4.0, I'm on > board with that. That is easy enough to understand and not too > difficult to implement. What I'm disagreeing with is moving from gcc > 4.2.2 to gcc 4.3.3.
This would be similar to going from GCC 3.1.1 to GCC 3.2 when there was a break in binary compatibility. Janis
