Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Am I the only one who completely fails to see the point of the > > spelling change? I realize that you have said you find negative > > predicates confusing - I don't, but I do find changing predicates > > confusing. I applaud cleaning up the definition and/or replacing it > > with a macro, and I'd applaud adding some extra internals > > documentation about it, but I think the fact that it's been called > > no_new_pseudos for so long suggests that we should just leave it > > called that if we want a predicate that means the same thing. > > I agree. This is unnecessary churn that'll do nothing except make it > harder to move patches between branches.
I disagree, as I've stated several times. And we're only talking about 154 occurrences here across the whole compiler, and this is not code which changes frequently. I believe we can tolerate that amount of churn. Ian
