Lawrence Crowl writes:
> On the specific topic of unions, there is a proposal before the
>committee to extend unions in this direction. Let me caution you
>that this proposal has not been reviewed by a significant fraction
>of the committee, and hence has a small chance of being accepted
>and an even smaller chance of surviving unchanged.
This only supports my position. If an active comittee member can't
get their proposal reviewed by a significant fraction of the committee,
then why should an outsider even bother? You're better off posting a
patch to gcc-patches, at least that will have a chance of being seriously
considered.
Ross Ridge
