On 6/19/07, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OTOH, if we start to produce NaN for sqrt(0.0) that is of course simply > 'wrong', not inaccurate ;) I still support the introduction of a special switch for this kind of transformation, -fwrong-math-optimizations. :-)
Probably as useful and widely-used as -fhello-world? ;) Richard.
