Sergei Organov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I like the idea. I'd also suggest that group options won't do anything > else but affecting [default values of] simple options. It means that one > will be able to substitute a set of simple options for a "group option" > without change in behavior (for example, this is not currently the case > for -O,-O1,-O2 options).
That is a separate idea, and should be considered separately. I don't personally think it would be all that useful. We would simply wind up with more options like -fexpensive-optimizations: basically random and changing behaviour from release to release. Ian
