On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:04:01PM +0200, Thomas Neumann wrote: > I see your point. I originally thought I would be sending one patch for > whole gcc (as I have the complete patch ready), just broken into smaller > parts for reviewing.
If possible, 1) Break patches up into parts which can be applied individually without breaking anything. If they must be applied in a specific order, say so. 2) Break patches up into parts each needing only one maintainer's approval. E.g. your patch covering reload.h, reload.c and reload1.c is fine in this regard. [patch tracker] > I tried this for a few patches, but I have some problems finding out > what area I should write there... Approximately the same as you'd use in the subject line. I would use the MAINTAINERS file and the bug database component field as a guide. -- Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
