On Friday 25 May 2007, Thomas Koenig wrote: > What about a keyword for bugs that > > - generate wrong code > - affect a standard-conforming program > - are silent (no error message)
We already have one: "wrong-code" 1 and 3 mutually exclusive. ie. if we generate an error, then by definition we don't generate bad code because the compilation process never gets that far. 2 is a IMHO fairly academic distinction. We either care about code working (and support no-conforming code as an extension), or we decide that we're ok with that particular code being broken. Paul
