Jason Merrill wrote: > Mark Mitchell wrote: >> PR 30252: Wrong code generation, perhaps due to the C++ front end's >> representation for base classes. Jason, are you actively investigating >> this one? > > I haven't been; I've been working on the forced unwind stuff, and > looking at the rvalue refs patch. If you want I can work on this first, > but I doubt that the patch would be safe enough for the release branch.
Yes, that's a good point. > Also, has someone actually verified that this is something that would be > fixed by the bases-as-fields work? No, I don't think we know. There's speculation in the PR trail, but that's it. I'd appreciate it if you were able to investigate further, but I think I'd best just accept that this will not be fixed for 4.2.0. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
