On Tuesday 08 May 2007 14:35:26 Richard Guenther wrote: > On 5/8/07, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Fix for PR31264 doesn't seem to be checked into 4.2.0 branch which breaks > > MPlayer SVN compilation with : > > > > cc -I../libavcodec -I../libavformat -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I. > > -I.. -I../libavutil -O4 -march=pentium-m -mtune=pentium-m -pipe > > -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -D_REENTRANT -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -I/usr/include > > -I/usr/include/ -I/usr/include/SDL -D_REENTRANT > > -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include -c -o demux_vqf.o demux_vqf.c > > demux_vqf.c: In function 'demux_open_vqf': > > demux_vqf.c:24: internal compiler error: in build_int_cst_wide, at > > tree.c:864 > > > > [/packages/mplayer]> cc -v > > Using built-in specs. > > Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu > > Configured > > with: /var/pisi/gcc-4.2.0-23/work/gcc-4.2.0-20070430/configure > > --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc/4.2.0 > > --includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.0/include > > --datadir=/usr/share/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.0 > > --mandir=/usr/share/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.0/man > > --infodir=/usr/share/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.0/info > > --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.0/include/g++-v > >3 --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --disable-libgcj > > --disable-libssp --disable-multilib --disable-nls --disable-werror > > --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-__cxa_atexit > > --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new > > --enable-shared --enable-ssp --enable-threads=posix > > --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --without-included-gettext > > --without-system-libunwind --with-system-zlib Thread model: posix > > gcc version 4.2.0 20070430 (prerelease) (Pardus Linux) > > > > It seems to be a one liner fix which is in mainline for some time, would > > it be ok to check it into 4.2.0 branch too? > > Did you verify this is actually the same problem? Note that this PR > isn't marked as > broken on 4.2.0 or as a regression, so you should probably file a new > bugreport against 4.2.0 and link to the old one.
The file and function is the same but the code looks different. I'll file a PR for 4.2.0 branch. Thanks. Regards, ismail -- Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.