On 5/5/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
>> > Another problem is that --enable-checking hasn't been set to 'release',
>> > so the stage1 binary is too big to run on my ARM systems (and the
>> > compiler will be unnecessarily slower than it needs to be).
>> Are you sure that we're not building with release-checking only?
>
> stage1 is always built with checking enabled.
OK. There's a good chance that both Richard E. and I didn't realize
that (it didn't use to be true). So, from what you're saying, there
doesn't seem to be an evidence that this is a real problem.
Do we build stage1 with checking enabled even if --disable-checking is
in effect? Otherwise, how to do folks like Richard E. that are running
natively on small systems work around this issue?
Specifying --disable-stage1-checking should work. (it's in the toplevel
configure)
Richard.
