I discovered PR29365 today while testing 4.2.0 RC2 on a client's
codebase. This causes some of my code, based on the popular pimpl
idiom, to generate warnings, even with no warning flags specified. If
there's a way to turn it off without patching the source, I can't find it.
Given the pervasiveness of the pimpl idiom in C++, and the increasing
use of anonymous namespaces in modern code, it is possible that this
will be a serious problem for some C++ developers, that may hinder the
adoption of 4.2. It's not hard to imagine that this could come up in a
lot of other weird places that uses anonymous namespaces, too.
Does this qualify as a regression? Does anyone else think this is a
serious problem?
- Backport fix for spurious anonymous ns warnings PR293... Aaron W. LaFramboise
-