Hi!
Sorry about the (possibly off) question: would this apply also to
GMP/MPFR, if not, wouldn't it make sense?
Philippe
François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Attached is a first draft of a patch to add a -fstatic-libgfortran
> option. This new option is recognized by the driver and instead of
> adding "-lgfortran" to the various subprocesses, it adds "-Wl,-Bstatic
> -lgfortran -Wl,-Bdynamic". I have two questions about this:
> + linkers other than the GNU linker might have problems with that.
> is there a more general way of doing this? or should it be conditional
> on some macro, like HAVE_LD_STATIC_DYNAMIC?
> + when -static is used later in the command line, this trick doesn't
> work; would "%{!static:-Wl,-Bstatic} -lgfortran
> %{!static:-Wl,-Bdynamic}" be a good replacement?
>
> Thanks for the help, I'm a bit a loss with non-GNU linkers... :(
>
> FX
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: static-libgfortran.diff
> static-libgfortran.diff Type: text/x-patch
> Encoding: base64
