On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 05:49:03PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > But fold_binary takes trees as parameters. How are you thinking of > calling it?
The operands of gimple statements are still trees. Very simple trees, mind, but trees. r~
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 05:49:03PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > But fold_binary takes trees as parameters. How are you thinking of > calling it?
The operands of gimple statements are still trees. Very simple trees, mind, but trees. r~