Andrew Pinski wrote on 04/10/07 16:04: > On 4/10/07, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Here is the quick patch (thanks to the work done for gimple tuple) >> which does this, removes the unneeded type from phi nodes. I have not >> tested it except for a quick test on some small testcases so there >> might be more places which use TREE_CHAIN instead of PHI_CHAIN. > > This patch has one problem, the GC issue with chain_next and > lang_tree_node, this problem is not hard to fix.
I'm not sure what you want me to do with this patch. It's not related to this thread and would not be applicable to the tuples branch. I would suggest that you thoroughly test the patch, measure the benefit and if it's good enough propose it for 4.3.
