Richard Guenther wrote on 04/10/07 10:45: > On 4/10/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Steven Bosscher wrote on 04/10/07 02:43: >>> I don't really like the idea for promoting subcodes to first-level >>> codes, like you do for GS_COND NE and EQ. Looks complicated and >>> confusing to me. What is the benefit of this? >> Mostly, speed of recognition. I'm not totally against dropping this. >> As Andrew M. mentioned during our internal discussions, we will now have >> to implement predicates that recognize all the insns in the "GS_COND" >> family. >> >> This is something that we can do some experimentation. > > Will this replace the tree code class or is it merely sub-classing and > the sub-code > is the real code we have now?
Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say.
