On 4/9/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Evening all, just a quick question:
[ ref: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31513, "
[4.2/4.3 Regression] Miscompilation of Function Passing Bit Field Value to
Function" ]
Should promotion of function arguments be explicitly represented in GIMPLE,
or should it be performed when generating the corresponding RTL? It doesn't
appear to be taking place correctly for the <unnamed type>s used to represent
bitfields.
There is a conversion missing on the tree level. See also PR31136.
Richard.
