Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 02:23:47PM +0100, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: | > On 27/03/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > >* Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-27 14:08]: | > >> C++ preprocessor emits errors by default for nonconformant code, | > >> following the C++ frot-end default behaviour. Users can use the | > >> -fpermissive option to downgrade these diagnostics from errors to | > >> warnings. | > > | > >s/frot-end/front-end/ | > > | > >I'm not sure whether "nonconformant code" is specific enough. Apart | > >from this, it looks good. | > | > It comes from the definition of fpermissive in invoke.texi. | | Users aren't going to know from this language what has changed. Manuel, | since you're the guy who has been studying the warnings lately: which | other preprocessor diagnostics, other than "no newline at end of file", | are affected by this change?
I believe there is a bug in the diagnostic flag setting. A pedwarn is a warning by default. It becomes a hard error only if -pedantic. If that is not happening, then we have a bug. -- Gaby
