Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | * Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-27 13:13]: > | > So if you are seeing this in C++, the change was intentional because > | > PR24924 was fixed. If you are seeing it in C and you are not using > | > pedantic-errors, then it is probably a bug. > | > | Thanks for the explanation - this explains what I'm seeing. Is there > | a good reason against changing this particular warning from > | CPP_DL_PEDWARN to CPP_DL_WARNING? Quite a few packages in Debian fail > | to build because of this and it seems overly strict to me. However, if > | it'll remain an error with C++ code, I'll start filing bugs on these > | packages. > > -pedantic asks for strict checking of rules. User should accept > correcting their codes (or used codes) with they ask for strict checking.
I agree, but what is happening now is that "no newline at end of file" is an error even when -pedantic is not specified. I don't think that is acceptable. Ian
