Joe Buck writes: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:35:15AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > On 3/19/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >This brings up a point: the build procedure doesn't work by default on > > >Debian-like amd64 distros, because they lack 32-bit support (which is > > >present on Red Hat/Fedora/SuSE/etc distros). Ideally this would be > > >detected when configuring. > > > > Actually it brings up an even more important thing, distros that don't > > include a 32bit user land is really just broken. Why do these distros > > even try to get away with this, they are useless to 99.9% of the > > people and for the 0.1% of the people who find them interesting, they > > can just compile with --disable-multilib. > > Unfortunately, such distros are in common use, and the GCC project jumps > through hoops to support many things that get far less use. > > A platform that contains only 64-bit libraries is fundamentally a > different platform than one that has both 32- and 64-. Ideally there > would be a different target triplet for such platforms. Maybe > x86_64only? But that would have to be handled upstream. > > In the meantime, the installation instructions should tell people to > use --disable-multilib.
Will that work? Unless there's some more configury I don't understand, they'll still end up with libraries in /lib64 rather than /lib. Andrew.
