On 14 Mar 2007 07:22:10 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dorit Nuzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> D.2103_79 = BIT_FIELD_REF <{2, 2}, 64, 0>; > > > ...which causes he following ICE: > " > bug.c:8: error: invalid reference prefix > {2, 2} > bug.c:8: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed > " Maybe fold-const.c needs to recognize this case? Actually it seems like it already does. Why didn't it get folded by substitute_and_fold?
Dom doesn't use the propagator engine but relies on fold_stmt_in_place. That one eventually calls fold() on the rhs, either that didn't work out or set_rhs rejected the folding result. I leave the resolution as an excercise for the reader ;) Richard.
