Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Likewise: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg00167.html
This patch looks wrong to me. I don't understand how it could be correct in the presence of __attribute__ ((aligned (N))). It checks TYPE_PACKED but not TYPE_ALIGN or TYPE_USER_ALIGN. The default hook assumes that objects larger than pointers are not naturally aligned, which does not make sense to me: given a type, we know the alignment, and we should use that. I don't know whether this is still a problem. If it is, I hope the IBM Haifa folks will look at the test cases. Thanks for pointing out the patch. :REVIEWURL http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg00167.html: Ian
