Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > And we don't want to arm our detractors with bad SPEC numbers. I can just | > imagine the FUD spreading... we've got to fix it or backout. | | For me as a gcc user miscompilations are far worse than bad SPEC numbers. | I never run SPEC, but if my programs are miscompiled I am in deep trouble. | I expect many other people to feel similar. Broken programs are infinitely | worse than slower programs.
I strongly agree. -- Gaby
