Richard Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I know Andrew replied privately, but I hope he doesn't mind me raising > the issue on-list. I just wanted to guage the general feeling as to > whether I'd screwed up, and whether I should have submitted the patches > in a different way.
IMHO this is a good example of how to split a big change into smaller, functionally more or less independent parts. The only problem I see is that one can easily lose track of which patches were already reviewed. Perhaps it would have been better to send them in smaller batches. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
