[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kenner) writes:
[...]
| > for (i = 1; i < m; ++i)
| > {
| > if (i > 0)
| > bar ();
| > }
|
| Of course, this is an example where either the programmer is doing something
| very silly or else is expecting overflow and depending on wrap semantics, so
| it seems to me marginal to remove that "if". My suggestion would be to issue
| a warning saying that the test will never be false, but leaving it in.
That make sense to me.
-- Gaby
