On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 14:47 -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Sohail Somani wrote:
>
> > struct __some_random_name
> > {
> > void operator()(int & t){t++;}
> > };
> >
> > for_each(b,e,__some_random_name());
> >
> > Would this require a new tree node like LAMBDA_FUNCTION or should the
> > parser do the translation? In the latter case, no new nodes should be
> > necessary (I think).
>
> Do you need new class types, or just an anonymous FUNCTION_DECL?
Hi Mark, thanks for your reply.
In general it would be a new class. If the lambda function looks like:
void myfunc()
{
int a;
...<>(int i1,int i2) extern (a) {a=i1+i2}...
}
That would be a new class with an int reference (initialized to a) and
operator()(int,int).
Does that clarify?
Sohail
