Re: expand_omp_parallel typo?

[Diego Novillo]

Marcin Dalecki wrote on 10/18/06 00:27:

   bsi_insert_after (&si, t, TSI_SAME_STMT);
Shouldn't this bee

   bsi_insert_after (&si, t, BSI_SAME_STMT);

instead?

Yes.  We lucked out because both symbols have the same numeric value. 
Patch pre-approved as obvious.


PS: Please do not use existing threads to start an unrelated one.