"Fu, Chao-Ying" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think there is a bug in mips_pass_by_reference when the mips abi > is EABI to pass TImode parameters.
Good catch. > Does someone know how to pass TImode parameters in EABI? Thanks! I imagine this case wasn't specifically considered. The EABI calls for double-word integers to be passed by value on 32-bit targets, so if 128-bit integers had been considered, I imagine the EABI would call for them to be handled in the same way on 64-bit targets. As it is, the EABI uses stack passing as the fallback case for "parameters not otherwise handled above". So I think the type != NULL case is doing the right thing. Sticking with it also has the advantage that it wouldn't break backward compatiblity for cases that currently work. I don't think this particular case has ever worked for libcalls. I'll whip up a patch tonight. I imagine this is also the reason for the gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-timode.c failures on mipsisa64-elf, which I haven't had the spare time to look at yet. Richard
