Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
I think that front ends should be allowed to omits zeros for
initializers for variables with static storage duration, but not other
initializers, independent of what C99 says.
I think we "read past each other". I was just countering what
(I read as) your statement that for C semantics, only omitted
subobjects in initialiers of objects with *static storage* are
zero-initialized; i.e. that others are ok to be left undefined
by an implementation.
Right, I think we were at cross-purposes; to be clear, I wasn't
commenting at all about C semantics, but rather about what I think the
internal GCC IR semantics should be.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713
