Roberto COSTA wrote on 09/28/06 05:51: > If time allows me, I'd like to try to see what happens if COND_EXPRs are > kept throughout the GIMPLE passes (I confess I'm curious). Logically, I > see them as richer constructs (they carry more information than the > equivalent control-flow code), like MIN_EXPRs and MAX_EXPRs. > Be wary of VRP and thread jumping if you do this. Both rely on the current COND_EXPR format quite heavily.
> What do you mean by "tree combiner"? > A pass that combines two or more GIMPLE statements into a single GIMPLE statement. At least one effort started down this path but was never completed.
