Re: Removing the use of CONSTRUCTOR for Vectors

[Chris Lattner]

On Sep 16, 2006, at 10:23 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
I just got crazy idea, since we really don't like CONSTRUCTOR that  
much
and we already know the lengths of Vectors, we can have a VECTOR_EXPR
which we could then use instead of CONSTRUCTORs.

What don't you like about CONSTRUCTOR's?  Taking the address of a  
CONSTRUCTOR is abuse, but if that doesn't happen, what is the  
problem?  Do you propose to have a new ARRAY_EXPR, RECORD_EXPR,  
UNION_EXPR, etc node for each type?

-Chris