Eric,
Yesterday's gcc trunk (with the residual TImode patch) shows the following
gcc
testsuite failures at -m64...
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t001 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t003 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t005 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t006 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t008 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t016 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t024 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t026 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t028 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/_Pragma6.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c (test for errors, line 108)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c (test for errors, line 126)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c (test for errors, line 135)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c (test for errors, line 162)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c (test for errors, line 180)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c (test for errors, line 234)
FAIL: gcc.dg/array-9.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/array-9.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/asm-b.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-10.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-11.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-8.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-9.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/framework-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-timode.c -O0 execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-timode.c -O1 execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-timode.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-timode.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-timode.c -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-timode.c -Os execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/section-anchors-pr27770.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/section-anchors-pr27770.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/section-anchors-vect-69.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/section-anchors-vect-69.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of
access forced using peeling 4
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/darwin-bool-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-negeq0-1.c scan-assembler-not cntlzw
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/stabs-attrib-vect-darwin.c scan-assembler
.stabs.*vi:\\(0,16\\)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hopefully we can drive some of this down in the next few weeks though.
Jack
