>
>
> gcc generates two separate trees for compound literals in c and c++.
> As in this test case:
>
> struct S {
> int i,j;
> };
> void foo (struct S);
>
> int main ()
> {
> foo((struct S){1,1});
> }
> On the other hand, such a guard does not exist for a
> compound_literal_expr and when gimple_add_tmp_var is called, it
> asserts. So, I added check for
> !DECL_SEEN_IN_BIND_EXPR_P (decl) in
> gimplify_compound_literal_expr before call to gimple_add_tmp_var is
> made. As in the following diff:
I think you are trying to fix PR 28418 which is an ICE in gimple_add_tmp_var
with
compound literals in C.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
