Geoffrey Keating wrote:
Jason Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
Also, do you agree with warning about a class with greater
visibility than its data members/bases?
Sure... I would really like to disable this warning if possible,
since it will be produced thousands of times in a mozilla build ;-)
I find that surprising, since it sounds like VC++ gives the same
warning about a dllexport class with a non-dllexport base.
I think that if the aim is to have VC++ compatibility, that should be
separate from the 'right' solution.
Absolutely. I didn't put in that warning because it was in VC++, but I
wouldn't expect it to introduce new warnings moving code from VC++ to g++.
Jason
