On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:23:34PM -0700, Gary Funck wrote: > In my view, this is implementation-defined, and generally can vary > depending upon the underlying linker and OS technology. Further, > there is at least one known platform (IA64) which seems to not impose > this restriction.
You're kidding, right? *All* targets have to generate different code for thread-local storage. If it didn't, it wouldn't be thread-local, would it? r~
